Warning: Illegal string offset 'label_text' in /home/environ5/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-members/includes/class-wp-members-forms.php on line 1141

Warning: Illegal string offset 'label' in /home/environ5/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-members/includes/class-wp-members-forms.php on line 1143

Warning: Illegal string offset 'field' in /home/environ5/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-members/includes/class-wp-members-forms.php on line 1145

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
   
New User Registration
R
R
*Required field
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Fox

We can clarify in the revision but my response is:

First “shape’ has both a strict and colloquial interpretation. Many of the distributions used for SSDs have a shape parameter (lognormal, loglogistic, Burr etc.). So in that sense we don’t have to provide a definition for accepted statistical terminology. In the more general context, I would have thought “shape” was a term that was well understood. In SSD modelling I would say we’re talking about: symmetry (or lack of) = skewness; peakedness = kurtosis; and how ‘heavy’ the tails are. Distributions that basically look the same (eg a normal and a logistic) will, by anyone’s assessment, have similar shapes.

Carl Schwarz

Agree